canon aps

our highest rated review:

Sep. 24, 2002 by Bob Dodge

I first bought this camera for my daughter to take on a trip to New Zealand and Australia. When she returned I was so impressed with her pi...more

most helpful positive review:

Sep. 24, 2002 by Bob Dodge

I first bought this camera for my daughter to take on a trip to New Zealand and Australia. When she returned I was so impressed with her pi...more

our highest rated review:

Aug. 15, 2006

Received my first batch of pictures. Overall the camera did what it was expected to do. It came with a 28x90 lens ( have no idea what that m...more

most helpful positive review:

Aug. 15, 2006 by null

Received my first batch of pictures. Overall the camera did what it was expected to do. It came with a 28x90 lens ( have no idea what that m...more

our highest rated review:

Dec. 27, 2003 by Rafi

If you want a camera that is non-digital, this is probably the best. It is small and light, so you can carry it anywhere, and has 3 differen...more

our lowest rated review:

Jun. 6, 2003 by fotografer

I understand you have to wait until an image is focused when snapping a pic, but it seems very unnecesary, and from my experience, inconvien...more

our highest rated review:

Dec. 27, 2003 by Rafi

If you want a camera that is non-digital, this is probably the best. It is small and light, so you can carry it anywhere, and has 3 differen...more

our lowest rated review:

Jun. 6, 2003 by fotografer

I understand you have to wait until an image is focused when snapping a pic, but it seems very unnecesary, and from my experience, inconvien...more

our highest rated review:

Dec. 27, 2003 by Rafi

If you want a camera that is non-digital, this is probably the best. It is small and light, so you can carry it anywhere, and has 3 differen...more

our lowest rated review:

Jun. 6, 2003 by fotografer

I understand you have to wait until an image is focused when snapping a pic, but it seems very unnecesary, and from my experience, inconvien...more

our highest rated review:

Dec. 27, 2003 by Rafi

If you want a camera that is non-digital, this is probably the best. It is small and light, so you can carry it anywhere, and has 3 differen...more

our lowest rated review:

Jun. 6, 2003 by fotografer

I understand you have to wait until an image is focused when snapping a pic, but it seems very unnecesary, and from my experience, inconvien...more

our highest rated review:

Dec. 27, 2003 by Rafi

If you want a camera that is non-digital, this is probably the best. It is small and light, so you can carry it anywhere, and has 3 differen...more

our lowest rated review:

Jun. 6, 2003 by fotografer

I understand you have to wait until an image is focused when snapping a pic, but it seems very unnecesary, and from my experience, inconvien...more

our highest rated review:

Dec. 27, 2003 by Rafi

If you want a camera that is non-digital, this is probably the best. It is small and light, so you can carry it anywhere, and has 3 differen...more

our lowest rated review:

Jun. 6, 2003 by fotografer

I understand you have to wait until an image is focused when snapping a pic, but it seems very unnecesary, and from my experience, inconvien...more

our highest rated review:

Dec. 27, 2003 by Rafi

If you want a camera that is non-digital, this is probably the best. It is small and light, so you can carry it anywhere, and has 3 differen...more

our lowest rated review:

Jun. 6, 2003 by fotografer

I understand you have to wait until an image is focused when snapping a pic, but it seems very unnecesary, and from my experience, inconvien...more